Get Product Computer Dust Solutions CPU Dust Cover, Covers PC Case, Silky Smooth Antistatic Vinyl, Translucent Coconut Cream Color with Blue Trim, Several Sizes Available, for ATX Desktop Tower (8W x 18H x 19D)

Get Product Computer Dust Solutions CPU Dust Cover, Covers PC Case, Silky Smooth Antistatic Vinyl, Translucent Coconut Cream Color with Blue Trim, Several Sizes Available, for ATX Desktop Tower (8W x 18H x 19D)

Check:… To Buy Get Product Computer Dust Solutions CPU Dust Cover, Covers PC Case, Silky Smooth Antistatic Vinyl, Translucent Coconut Cream Color with Blue Trim, Several Sizes Available, for ATX Desktop Tower (8W x 18H x 19D) via Best Recommendation Toshiba Products –…

Posted by katharinemcphee on 2014-03-03 22:36:19

Tagged: , , toshiba , drivers , asus , laptop , support , deals , laptops , notebooks , gaming , cheap , best , reviews , driver , for , sale , direct , mini , touch , screen

Where to buy Manhattan 421010 LCD Mini Cleaning Kit (online)

Where to buy Manhattan 421010 LCD Mini Cleaning Kit (online)

Manhattan 421010 LCD Mini Cleaning Kit

Isopropyl alcohol-free
Safe for use on LCD surfaces – helps restore and maintain brightness and clarity
Ideal for use with flat panel displays, notebook computers, televisions and more
Soft brush gently eliminates excess dust and debris without……

Posted by maryshitlaw on 2014-02-25 06:30:14

Tagged: , 421010 , Cleaning , Manhattan , Mini , online

It was bound to happen.

It was bound to happen.

SimCity 4 Rush Hour at full HD resolution on a 52" television.

Posted by reindeerhelmet on 2010-09-26 20:24:01

Tagged: , simcity , sim , city , maxis , tv , hdtv , hd , resolution , 1920×1080 , 1080p , computer , cable , cable box , surround , sound , system , surround sound , speaker , sub , subwoofer , pc , windows , mac , mini , osx , living , room , living room , carpet , wall , corner , floor , lamp , floor lamp , brown , white , ansel adams , photo , outlet , wire , dust , dusty , tsetse , tsetse fly

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro – Experience the Feel

Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro – Experience the Feel

They say that all good things come in small packages. Well, now this famous quote has been brought to life. Look out for Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro and you would get to know what we are talking about. This small packet has indeed come into the arena to let everyone hear the boom. Hiding a full QWERTY keyboard behind its face, this gadget has come all set to surprise everyone with the degree of compactness and level of technicalities.

Let us first count the positives contained inside this small but geeky gadget. Within its ultra compact body resides a customized Android OS v1.6 which makes the phoning experience a smoother one. Not to forget multitasking which is any day a peaceful and a smooth experience. The 5 megapixel camera with LED flash and VGA recording is surely the USP and is responsible for the majority of the foot falls.

The latest Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro has built-in GPS receiver and digital compass, made to make sure that you never have to depend on anyone so as to trace the right ways. Another important point is the microSD card slot which could well support memory up to 8 GB. This certainly makes way for loads of data and less of worries. One more hard-to-miss show stealer is obviously the Android market, which is a store house of fun and excitement. In all, this mini device is a fun gizmo to own and live with.

These days, going for the handsets like Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro is surely a cakewalk as one does not have to think and rethink about the price or any other factor. There are various online mobile comparison, sale and purchase portals which not only help the user in making the right choice but also guide them in grabbing the best way to reach the same. For instance, Mobiles Comparison Shop which has a series of deals and offers to present to its customers spread all across the globe.

To start with there are various Xperia X10 Mini Pro deals to help the users grab their favorite handset. These deals indeed make the purchase by the user a pleasurable experience. He could also avail exciting free gifts along with his purchase like gaming gizmos, laptops and much more. Further, there are Xperia X10 Mini Pro contract which allows the user to choose for him the best deals keeping in view his usage and budget. These contracts come associated with plans for fixed periods like 12, 18 or 24 months. Thus, it helps in easing off the worries of paying lump sum in one go. Now, get set to enjoy the technology.

Harry Johnson is one of the many writers who creates interesting and thought-provoking content on all ranges of latest technology and gizmo. He is a complete source for any piece of information regarding mobile phone deals. Get the latest updates on Sony Ericsson Phones, Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini Pro , Xperia X10 Mini Pro deals, Xperia X10 Mini Pro payg, cheap Xperia X10 Mini Pro deals.

Samsung Galaxy Mini Replicates The Galaxy S In A More Petite Body

Samsung Galaxy Mini Replicates The Galaxy S In A More Petite Body

The Samsung Galaxy Mini is a phone that is causing a lot of interest and buzz in the budget end of the mobile phone spectrum due to the fact that it is a phone that is going to handle a number of features, despite the presence in this segment that is known for being cost conscious. The Samsung Galaxy Mini manages to do this by introducing most of the features of the Samsung Galaxy S. Obviously, some of the features have been not included with a view of reducing the cost of the phone, but overall, the Samsung Galaxy Mini seems to be a replicate the Samsung Galaxy S.

The features of the Samsung Galaxy Mini will be starting with the 3.14 inch touch screen display. If you thought that getting a touch screen display in this segment is something to be cherished, then you will be left surprised by the capacitive technology that is also going to be present in this touch screen display. Normally, this is going to be present only in the high-end or even the mid-range of smartphones, but to the present in the budget end of the spectrum is really the amazing aspect of the phone. It will make the phone recognise multiple touches, which is something that not many phones in the segment can claim to be offering. This is a significant advantage over the competition and the gap between the rivals only deepens when they take a look at the other features of the phone.

It will be using the latest TouchWiz 3.0 user interface, which means that you will be having a very good interface for operating the Android operating system present in the phone. The major reason for including this highly productive operating system, which has so far been seen only in the high-end mobile phones is due to the powerful processor that is present in it. It will be capable of running the Android operating system quite brilliantly due to the fact that it matches up with the various requirements of the operating system. Further, it is capable of doing this due to the presence of decent amounts of RAM in the phone. Apart from providing memory for the RAM purposes, Samsung seems to have also provided the Samsung Galaxy Mini with sufficient amount of internal and external memory.

The internal memory will be 160 MB, while the external memory will be 2 GB, although it’s not the platform that can be included into the Samsung Galaxy Mini. This will be able to support up to 32 GB, which shows the amount of features present in this phone. The inclusion of the Samsung Galaxy Mini’s 3.15 megapixel camera is something that will also enable the phone to take photos as well. The Samsung Galaxy Mini is a phone that was made available in the UK market only a few weeks ago and it is available in contract options that start at around 10 per month, which makes it extremely attractive.

When searching for Samsung Galaxy Mini deals online you can save a great deal of money by doing a comparison. In this manner you can also find a great deal for the Samsung Galaxy S2.

Find More Replicant Urbanism Articles

Mini DVD replication-a fast, easy and cost-effective way to store critical data

Mini DVD replication-a fast, easy and cost-effective way to store critical data

Digital storage devices are one of the greatest inventions of digital technologies like CD, DVD or HD. Its sound storage device that keeps that documents and files protected. The increasing demand of these storage devices require duplication and replication processes. CD duplication is a popular way to produce small runs of discs, extensively used to produce sample print for approval. However, if you are looking to produce these devices in greater quantities, you must opt for CD DVD replication. It’s a full manufacturing process, uses for the runs of 1,000 units and over. The new formats like Blu-Ray and HD DVD have more capacity than other devices.

Additionally, Mini DVD replication is a cost effective way to create copies of 1000 or more mini DVDs. Its replication process is carried out like replication of standard DVDs. The diameter of disc is about 80mm and can hold larger amount of data in comparison to standard disc. Mini DVD replication is a great way to preserve and store exclusive videos, important data and other photos, which cannot be replaced. Unlike duplication, replication is an industrial process in which data is stamped into injected molded discs.  It’s more durable compare to Mini DVD duplication and gives a professional look as well.

Nowadays there are number of companies that offer with CD replication, DVD replication and High Definition replication, media and I.T services at reasonable rates. Digital storage devices are convenient mean to stores documents and files, so it can be a cause of loss of data in offices and corporate.  These days, the valuable files and documents are prone to plagiarism, piracy, illegal distributions and copying. Therefore data security is a major concern for all organization and individuals dealing with files and documents. Moreover, we need a perfect file and document security features that make the sensitive document safe and secured. Now the dealers offer Copy Block Protection software and services that provide complete protection to all printable files and documents.

This process protect all text based files and documents that you have saved in image based formats like tiff, jpg, bmp from getting hackneyed, plagiarized and illegally distribution. Besides these, EcoDisc are also available that are the patented type of DVD. It’s thinner than traditional DVD as it made of single layer of polycarbonate rather than two layers glued together.  As it contains less material so its manufacture produce only approximately half of the carbon dioxide of a conventional DVD. In EcoDisc non biodegradable toxic glue layer are absent that make is quite easy to recycle.

For more information about EcoDisc and cd duplication Please visit here

Find More Replicant Urbanism Articles

Sinnvolles Recycling / Meaningful Recyceling / Recyceling significative

Sinnvolles Recycling / Meaningful Recyceling / Recyceling significative

Beim Recycling oder Rezyklierung werden Abfallprodukte wiederverwertet bzw. deren Ausgangsmaterialien werden zu Sekundärrohstoffen.

Der Begriff ist ein Lehnwort aus dem Englischen (recycling – ausgesprochen [ɹɪˈsaɪklɪŋ] – für „Wiederverwertung“ oder „Wiederaufbereitung“); etymologisch leitet es sich vom griechischen kýklos (Kreis) sowie dem lateinischen Präfix re- (zurück, wieder) ab.

Der Begriff Recycling ist etwa definiert als „jedes Verwertungsverfahren, durch das Abfälle zu Erzeugnissen, Materialien oder Stoffen entweder für den ursprünglichen Zweck oder für andere Zwecke aufbereitet werden. Es schließt die Aufbereitung organischer Materialien ein, aber nicht die energetische Verwertung und die Aufbereitung zu Materialien, die für die Verwendung als Brennstoff oder zur Verfüllung bestimmt sind“ (§ 3 Abs. 25 deutsches Kreislaufwirtschaftsgesetz)

Gesetzlich wird erst von „Recycling“ gesprochen, wenn der Rohstoff zuvor als „Abfall“ einzustufen war; andernfalls handelt es sich um „Wiederverwendung“. Der umgangssprachliche Gebrauch des Begriffs Recycling umfasst oft beide Bedeutungen.
Gemäß EU-Vorgaben besteht folgende Abfallhierarchie[4], die allen Rechtsvorschriften und politischen Maßnahmen im Bereich der Abfallvermeidung und -bewirtschaftung als Prioritätenfolge zugrunde liegt:

Abfallvermeidung: hierzu gehört unter anderem auch das Verbot von umweltgefährdenden Stoffen wie PCB, FCKW.
Vorbereitung zur Wiederverwendung: das heißt eine erneute Nutzung des Guts wie Pfandflasche, Second-Hand-Use.
Recycling durch stoffliche Verwertung: definierte Abfallstoffströme oder Teile davon werden aufbereitet, um daraus wieder vermarktungsfähige Sekundärrohstoffe zu gewinnen.
sonstige Verwertung, z. B. durch energetische Verwertung: die Stoffe werden verbrannt oder vergast, jedoch mit dem alleinigen Ziel der Energiegewinnung.
Beseitigung, z. B. durch Deponieren.
Entgegen dem häufig etwas unklaren allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch beinhaltet Recycling demnach nur den Punkt 3) dieser Liste. Recycling wird gemäß EU-Richtlinie definiert als jedes Verwertungsverfahren, durch das Abfallmaterialien zu Erzeugnissen, Materialien oder Stoffen entweder für den ursprünglichen Zweck oder für andere Zwecke aufbereitet werden. Es schließt die Aufbereitung organischer Materialien ein, aber nicht die energetische Verwertung und die Aufbereitung zu Materialien, die für die Verwendung als Brennstoff oder zur Verfüllung bestimmt sind.

Downcycling und Upcycling
Ein möglicher Nachteil von beispielsweise Kunststoff ist, dass – bei vertretbarem Aufwand – das Material nicht mehr die ursprüngliche Qualität oder deren Verarbeitbarkeit erreicht wie bei der Primärherstellung vor dem Recyclingprozess. Diese Abwertung wird auch als Downcycling bezeichnet, während beim Upcycling aus Abfallstoffen eines Prozesses hochwertigere Produkte hergestellt werden können. Reststoffe, die während des Recyclingvorganges bestimmter organischer Materialien anfallen, werden Spuckstoffe genannt.

Die Neigung eines Polymers bei der Wiederverarbeitung zu degradieren, hängt vom gewählten Aufbereitungsverfahren ab und vom jeweiligen Grundpolymertyp sowie dem Gehalt an Additiven, die den thermisch-oxidativen Abbau der Molekülketten bei der Verarbeitung stark herabsetzen können. In einigen Fällen erreicht der verwertete Kunststoff durchaus das Eigenschaftsniveau der Originalware. Es kommt hierbei auf die Qualität und Sortenreinheit der gesammelten Altteile und den Aufbereitungsprozess und die Nachadditivierung an. Auch der Gesamtenergieverbrauch bei der Wiederaufbereitung wird vielfach überschätzt. Mit nicht mehr als rund 10 bis 15 MJ/kg Polymer (Thermoplast) ist bei Teilen, die eine Einzelmasse von mehr als 100 g besitzen, die komplette Aufbereitung durchführbar
Vor der Industrialisierung bestand der Müll hauptsächlich aus den Exkrementen von Menschen und Tieren, aus Lebensmittelabfällen, Ton- oder Glasscherben und wahrscheinlich auch Asche von den Feuerstellen. Die wohl älteste Form des Recyclings ist die traditionelle Düngemittelnutzung von pflanzlichen und tierischen Abfällen, insbesondere Ernteresten, Mist und Gülle, in der Landwirtschaft, die wohl so alt ist wie diese selbst. Diese vollständige Wiederverwertung ist Basis der Subsistenzwirtschaft. Im antiken Rom wurden die Exkremente eingesammelt und den Bauern im Umland verkauft. Im Mittelalter verfiel diese Organisation größtenteils – Exkremente und Abfälle wurden teilweise einfach nur auf die Straße gekippt und allenfalls von Haustieren „verwertet“. Später waren es Schrott- und Lumpensammler, die sich um das Einsammeln, Sortieren und Weiterleiten von wiederverwertbarem Material kümmerten. Die „Wegwerf-Mentalität“ der Industriezeit existierte aufgrund des Mangels an Gütern wie leeren Flaschen, gebrauchten Holz- oder Metallgegenständen und Ähnlichem nicht. Es war selbstverständlich, diese Gegenstände weiter zu verwerten. Aus Lebensmittelabfall wurde Haustierfutter, aus Knochen und Haaren wurden nützliche Dinge und aus Lumpen wurde Papier hergestellt. Holz- und Papierabfälle verheizte man und Metallteile wurden sowieso eingeschmolzen oder umgeschmiedet.

Mit der Industrialisierung veränderte sich auch Menge und Zusammenstellung des Mülls, so dass in London erste Kehrichtöfen entstanden, später auch die ersten Deponien. Als die Menschen nach den Weltkriegen zu immer mehr Wohlstand gelangten und sich auch Luxusgüter leisten konnten, zu denen auch eine aufwändigere Verpackung gehörte (Flaschen, Alufolie, Frischhaltebeutel, Blechdosen, Kunststoffflaschen), standen die Industrieländer vor einem akuten Müllnotstand. Ein normaler Haushalt, der vor 150 Jahren mit etwa 150 Dingen auskam, verwendete nun mehr als 20.000 Gegenstände, vom Zahnstocher bis zum Haarfestiger, vom Kleiderschrank bis zur Heftzwecke, und produzierte beispielsweise in der Bundesrepublik in den 1970er Jahren im Durchschnitt eine Hausmüllmenge von 4,7 kg pro Einwohner und Woche, das sind 244 kg pro Einwohner und Jahr. Dieser wurde großteils nicht mehr wiederverwendet, sondern weitgehend vollständig deponiert. Wiederwertung war nur in Notzeiten, besonders während und nach der Kriege, ein Thema.

Erst mit Aufkommen der Grünen Bewegung in den 1970/80ern fand ein Umdenken statt, dass Müllentsorgung einer der Hauptfaktoren der Umweltverschmutzung darstellt. Gleichzeitig entstand einerseits ein Bewusstsein um die Begrenzheit natürlicher Ressourcen insgesamt (etwa nach dem Ölschock der frühen 80er), andererseits wurde das Deponieren etwa in urbanen Ballungsräumen (Megacyties) zunehmend undurchführbar. Erste Anfänge zurück zu einer neuen Wiederverwertung war die anfangs freiwillige Mülltrennung, die zum Sinnbild einer ganzen Generation in der westlichen Welt wurde. Ausgehend von Altpapier-Wiederverwendung wurden zunehmend Technologien erarbeitet, die die Wiederaufbereitung aller Arten von Altstoffen wirtschaftlich machen, wodurch Abfall zu einem bedeutenden Wirtschaftsgut wurde: Geprägt wurde dafür der Ausdruck Sekundärrohstoff.

Schrott wird schon seit Urzeiten teils wiederverwertet, Eisenteile etwa durch Umschmieden. Besonders in Zeiten der Kriegswirtschaft wird auf Metallgegenstände des zivilen Gebrauches zurückgegriffen zwecks Sekundär-Rohstoffgewinnung zur Waffenproduktion, wie etwa 1940 unter dem Motto Metallspende des deutschen Volkes.

Die Verwertung von Fasern aus verwertbaren Altkleidern beherrschten bereits Papiermühlen der Renaissance. Altpapier-Wiederverwertungsverfahren gab es schon seit 1774, sodann beschrieben von Justus Claproth. Erst später kam es zur Anwendung in größerem Maßstab, verstärkt besonders in Zeiten der Kriegswirtschaft[13]. Mit zunehmendem Umwelt- und Kostenbewusstsein ab den 1980er-Jahren wuchs die Nachfrage nach Recyclingpapier erheblich, so dass der Altpapiermarkt bereits umkämpft ist unter Recyclingunternehmen[14].

In den 1960er-Jahren begann die DDR, vermittels Altstoffsammlungsaktionen und dem SERO-System der VEB Kombinat Sekundär-Rohstofferfassung Rohstoffe, u.a. zwecks Deviseneinsparung, systematisch mehrfach zu nutzen. Dabei gab es festgelegte Rücknahmepreise für verschiedene Altmaterialien.

In den 1970er Jahren wurden Umweltschutz und Abfallvermeidung zum offiziellen Aufgabengebiet des der Bundesrepublik erklärt: 1972 wurde das erste Abfallbeseitigungsgesetz der BRD beschlossen, 1975 das Abfallwirtschaftsprogramm ’75 der Bundesregierung und 1986 die TA Luft für die Vermeidung von Emissionen durch Abfälle und ihre Behandlung. Hinzu kamen später die Altölverordnung, die Verpackungsverordnung und 1996 das Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallgesetz (KrW-/AbfG)[15]. Dieses Gesetz und die zugehörigen Verordnungen verzeichnen detaillierte Vorschriften zur Vermeidung, Verwertung und Ablagerung von Abfällen. Prinzipiell ging es nicht mehr vorrangig um Kapazitätsfragen von Deponien, sondern in erster Linie darum, Müll zu vermeiden, wenn nicht möglich, ihn zu verwerten, und erst wenn dies nicht möglich ist, ihn zu deponieren (vgl. §4 Kreislaufwirtschafts- und Abfallgesetz). Es folgte der Europäische Abfallkatalog und das Duale System Deutschland (Grüner Punkt).

1994 wurde die Direktive des Umweltschutzes im Grundgesetz der Bundesrepublik Deutschland aufgenommen, wo es in Artikel 20a heißt:

„Der Staat schützt auch in Verantwortung für die zukünftigen Generationen die natürlichen Lebensgrundlagen und die Tiere im Rahmen der verfassungsgemäßen Ordnung durch die Gesetzgebung und nach Maßgabe von Gesetz und Recht durch die vollziehende Gewalt und die Rechtsprechung.“

Seit 2005 gilt das Elektro- und Elektronikgerätegesetz (ElektroG). Diese Richtlinie nahm die EU-Mitgliedstaaten in die Pflicht, bis zum 13. August 2005 ein funktionierendes E-Schrott Recycling-System in Betrieb einzurichten und ab Dezember 2006 mindestens vier Kilogramm pro Person und Jahr zu recyclen. Neben gängigem Elektronikschrott fallen auch LED- und Energiesparlampen (Kompaktleuchtstofflampen) unter diese Richtlinie, denn sie enthalten neben Quecksilber und weiteren problematischen Stoffen auch elektronische Bauteile. Die Sammlung wird in Deutschland von dem Retourlogistikunternehmen Lightcycle organisiert und erfolgt unter anderem in mehr als 2100 kommunalen Sammelstellen (Wertstoffhöfen, Schadstoffmobile etc.) und 4000 Sammelstellen im Handel und Handwerk (Drogeriemärkte, Baumärkte, Elektrohandwerker etc.). Für gewerbliche Mengen stehen mehr als 400 Großmengensammelstellen zur Verfügung. Mengen ab einer Tonne (etwa 5000 Altlampen) werden von dem Logistikunternehmen abgeholt.

Eine Systematik wurde durch den Recyclingcode eingeführt, den man im Wesentlichen auf Produkten aus Kunststoff, aber auch auf anderen Gegenständen finden kann.

Als Wiederverwertung sollte in erster Linie eine Wieder-/Weiterverwendung (‘Second Hand’) verstanden werden, auch wenn sich dies in der einschlägigen Gesetzgebung nicht in dieser Form wiederfindet. Direkte Wiederverwendung von gebrauchten Gegenständen und Stoffen ist die am wenigsten energie- und damit am wenigsten CO2-aufwändige Weiternutzung von Ressourcen.

1991 wurde von der Bundesregierung die Verpackungsverordnung erlassen, derzufolge zwecks Müllvermeidung ab einem bestimmten Markt-Anteil von Einwegverpackungen für Getränke ein Einwegpfand erhoben werden sollte. Dieses Pfand wird seit 2003 auf die meisten Einweg-PET-Flaschen und Getränkedosen erhoben. Die halbautomatische Pfandflaschen-Rücknahme in Supermärkten wurde inzwischen vielerorts entsprechend angepasst durch Rücknahme-Automaten, die Dosen und PET-Einwegflaschen zusammenpressen und separieren von Pfandflaschen, oder ergänzt um entsprechende separate Einwegverpackungs-Rücknahmeautomaten. Für die Getränkedosen wurde dadurch eine Recyclingquote erreicht, die fast dem Ideal der Kreislaufwirtschaft entspricht, während PET-Flaschen teils auch verbrannt oder zu Polyesterfasern verarbeitet werden.

In Österreich ist Recycling heute als zentrale Zielsetzung im § 1 des Abfallwirtschaftsgesetzes (AWG 2002) verankert.[16] Sammel- und Verwertungssysteme sind genehmigungspflichtig, haben die Maßgaben und Zielsetzungen der Umweltgesetze zu erfüllen und unterliegen der Aufsicht des Umweltministers.[17] Sie müssen „für zumindest eine Sammel- und Behandlungskategorie errichtet und betrieben werden“,[18] ob der Betreiber selbst recyclet oder einer Spezialfirma zuführt, bleibt der Geschäftsgebahrung überlassen. In der Praxis beruht Recycling auf Organisationen wie der Altstoff Recycling Austria (ARA-System im Verpackungsrecycling) oder dem Baustoff-Recycling Verband (BRV), die eine Schnittstelle zwischen den Verursachern, den Abfallsammlern (Gemeinden, gewerbliche Sammler) und den spezialisierten Recyclingunternehmen darstellt. Dieses System entwickelte sich auf freiwilligen Kooperationen ab den 1960ern.

Recycling ist in Österreich, das über wenig eigene Massenbodenschätze verfügt, und sich schon lange auf Veredelung spezialisiert hat, eine gut entwickelte Branche. Dazu gehört beispielsweise die Spezialstahlindustrie, auch Buntmetall wird vollständig in heimischen Betrieben wiederverwertet, oder die Verarbeitung von Holzabfall zu Werkstoffen (Spanplatten) oder Brennstoffen (Pellets, Preßbriketts) und von Papier und Kartonagen, die zu 100 % recyclet werden, ist gut entwickelt.[19] Insgesamt liegt Österreich beim werkstofflichen Recycling mit einer Quote von 30 % (2011) im guten europäischen Mittelfeld.

In der Gesamtrecyclingquote findet sich Österreich aber seit vielen Jahren an der Spitze aller europäischen Länder. Dies ist im besondern dem organischen Recycling, also der Wiederaufbereitung biologisch abbaubarer Materialien zu verdanken. Aus den etwa 4 Millionen Tonnen Bioabfällen (biogene Abfälle ohne Holz und Papier, etwa 8 % des Gesamtabfalls von 52 Mio. t), davon 700.000 t Pflanzen- und Speisereste aus Haushalten,[20], etwa dieselbe Menge aus Kleingärten und in der Landwirtschaft, und 750.000 t aus öffentlicher Grünflächenpflege,[21] werden geschätzt 1,5 Mio. t privat zu Kompost verarbeitet,[22] und mindestens 1,3 Mio. t gewerblich (es gibt etwa 465 Anlagen in Österreich),[23] weitere 300.000 t werden in Biogasanlagen verarbeitet (169 Anlagen, Kapazität bis 1 Mio. t).[24] Zusammen mit der traditionellen Düngemittelnutzung in der Landwirtschaft (Mist, Gülle und Ernteabfälle) ist die Recyclingquote bei Bioabfällen sehr hoch, und erreicht mit 33 % im Bereich der kommunalen Abfälle einen europäischen Spitzenwert mit Ausnahmecharakter (Niederlande als Nr. 2: 24 %, EU-27-Durchschnitt 14 %).[25]

Bei den getrennt erfassten Altstoffen aus Haushalten (und ähnlichen Einrichtungen, etwa 1,4 Mio. t) liegt die Recyclingquote mit 85 % weit über der Gesamtquote,[26] während der gemischte Siedlungsabfall (etwa dieselbe Menge) nur zu 2,1 % stofflich, und zu 19,6 % biotechnisch verwertet wird, der Rest wird der thermischen Verwertung zugeführt.[27] Das zeigt, dass die Entwicklungsfelder zum einen eine noch bessere Mülltrennung im Haushalt sind, und zum anderen hauptsächlich die in Gewerbe und Industrie.

Die Schweiz erreicht heute sowohl im Investitions- wie im Konsumgüterbereich beachtliche Recycling-Quoten. So gilt das Land beim Rücklauf von Alu-Dosen mit einer Quote deutlich über 90 % als „Weltmeister“, beim Papier blieb die Sammelmenge trotz rückläufigem Verbrauch von 2007 bis 2011 konstant hoch[28]. Möglich macht dies eine optimierte logistische Organisation und die verursachergerechte Volumengebühr durch eine steuerliche Belastung der Abfallsäcke, der sogenannten Sackgebühr.

Auch in der Schweiz wurde die Verwertung der industriellen Abfallprodukte in der Verfassung verankert:

„Bund und Kantone streben ein auf Dauer ausgewogenes Verhältnis zwischen der Natur und ihrer Erneuerungsfähigkeit einerseits und ihrer Beanspruchung durch den Menschen andererseits an. Der Bund erlässt Vorschriften über den Schutz des Menschen und seiner natürlichen Umwelt vor schädlichen oder lästigen Einwirkungen.“

Recycling is a process to change (waste) materials into new products to prevent waste of potentially useful materials, reduce the consumption of fresh raw materials, reduce energy usage, reduce air pollution (from incineration) and water pollution (from landfilling) by reducing the need for "conventional" waste disposal, and lower greenhouse gas emissions as compared to plastic production.[1][2] Recycling is a key component of modern waste reduction and is the third component of the "Reduce, Reuse and Recycle" waste hierarchy.

There are some ISO standards related to recycling such as ISO 15270:2008 for plastics waste and ISO 14001:2004 for environmental management control of recycling practice.

Recyclable materials include many kinds of glass, paper, metal, plastic, textiles, and electronics. Although similar in effect, the composting or other reuse of biodegradable waste—such as food or garden waste—is considered recycling.[2] Materials to be recycled are either brought to a collection center or picked up from the curbside, then sorted, cleaned, and reprocessed into new materials bound for manufacturing.

In the strictest sense, recycling of a material would produce a fresh supply of the same material—for example, used office paper would be converted into new office paper, or used foamed polystyrene into new polystyrene. However, this is often difficult or too expensive (compared with producing the same product from raw materials or other sources), so "recycling" of many products or materials involves their reuse in producing different materials (e.g., paperboard) instead. Another form of recycling is the salvage of certain materials from complex products, either due to their intrinsic value (e.g., lead from car batteries, or gold from computer components), or due to their hazardous nature (e.g., removal and reuse of mercury from various items). Critics dispute the net economic and environmental benefits of recycling over its costs, and suggest that proponents of recycling often make matters worse and suffer from confirmation bias. Specifically, critics argue that the costs and energy used in collection and transportation detract from (and outweigh) the costs and energy saved in the production process; also that the jobs produced by the recycling industry can be a poor trade for the jobs lost in logging, mining, and other industries associated with virgin production; and that materials such as paper pulp can only be recycled a few times before material degradation prevents further recycling. Proponents of recycling dispute each of these claims, and the validity of arguments from both sides has led to enduring controversy.
Recycling has been a common practice for most of human history, with recorded advocates as far back as Plato in 400 BC. During periods when resources were scarce, archaeological studies of ancient waste dumps show less household waste (such as ash, broken tools and pottery)—implying more waste was being recycled in the absence of new material.

In pre-industrial times, there is evidence of scrap bronze and other metals being collected in Europe and melted down for perpetual reuse.[4] In Britain dust and ash from wood and coal fires was collected by ‘dustmen’ and downcycled as a base material used in brick making. The main driver for these types of recycling was the economic advantage of obtaining recycled feedstock instead of acquiring virgin material, as well as a lack of public waste removal in ever more densely populated areas.[3] In 1813, Benjamin Law developed the process of turning rags into ‘shoddy’ and ‘mungo’ wool in Batley, Yorkshire. This material combined recycled fibres with virgin wool. The West Yorkshire shoddy industry in towns such as Batley and Dewsbury, lasted from the early 19th century to at least 1914.

Industrialization spurred demand for affordable materials; aside from rags, ferrous scrap metals were coveted as they were cheaper to acquire than was virgin ore. Railroads both purchased and sold scrap metal in the 19th century, and the growing steel and automobile industries purchased scrap in the early 20th century. Many secondary goods were collected, processed, and sold by peddlers who combed dumps, city streets, and went door to door looking for discarded machinery, pots, pans, and other sources of metal. By World War I, thousands of such peddlers roamed the streets of American cities, taking advantage of market forces to recycle post-consumer materials back into industrial production.[5]

Beverage bottles were recycled with a refundable deposit at some drink manufacturers in Great Britain and Ireland around 1800, notably Schweppes.[6] An official recycling system with refundable deposits was established in Sweden for bottles in 1884 and aluminium beverage cans in 1982, by law, leading to a recycling rate for beverage containers of 84–99 percent depending on type, and average use of a glass bottle is over 20 refills.

Recycling was a highlight throughout World War II. During the war, financial constraints and significant material shortages due to war efforts made it necessary for countries to reuse goods and recycle materials.[7] It was these resource shortages caused by the world wars, and other such world-changing occurrences that greatly encouraged recycling.[8] The struggles of war claimed much of the material resources available, leaving little for the civilian population.[7] It became necessary for most homes to recycle their waste, as recycling offered an extra source of materials allowing people to make the most of what was available to them. Recycling materials that were used in the household, meant more resources were available to support war efforts. This in turn meant a better chance of victory at war.[7] Massive government promotion campaigns were carried out in World War II in every country involved in the war, urging citizens to donate metals and conserve fibre, as a matter of significant patriotic importance. There was patriotism in recycling.

A considerable investment in recycling occurred in the 1970s, due to rising energy costs.[citation needed] Recycling aluminium uses only 5% of the energy required by virgin production; glass, paper and metals have less dramatic but very significant energy savings when recycled feedstock is used.

As of 2014, the European Union has about 50% of world share of the waste and recycling industries, with over 60,000 companies employing 500,000 persons, with a turnover of €24 billion.[10] Countries have to reach recycling rates of at least 50%, while the lead countries are around 65% and the EU average is 39% as of 2013.
For a recycling program to work, having a large, stable supply of recyclable material is crucial. Three legislative options have been used to create such a supply: mandatory recycling collection, container deposit legislation, and refuse bans. Mandatory collection laws set recycling targets for cities to aim for, usually in the form that a certain percentage of a material must be diverted from the city’s waste stream by a target date. The city is then responsible for working to meet this target.[2]

Container deposit legislation involves offering a refund for the return of certain containers, typically glass, plastic, and metal. When a product in such a container is purchased, a small surcharge is added to the price. This surcharge can be reclaimed by the consumer if the container is returned to a collection point. These programs have been very successful, often resulting in an 80 percent recycling rate. Despite such good results, the shift in collection costs from local government to industry and consumers has created strong opposition to the creation of such programs in some areas.[2]

A third method of increase supply of recyclates is to ban the disposal of certain materials as waste, often including used oil, old batteries, tires and garden waste. One aim of this method is to create a viable economy for proper disposal of banned products. Care must be taken that enough of these recycling services exist, or such bans simply lead to increased illegal dumping.[2]

Government-mandated demand
Legislation has also been used to increase and maintain a demand for recycled materials. Four methods of such legislation exist: minimum recycled content mandates, utilization rates, procurement policies, recycled product labeling.

Both minimum recycled content mandates and utilization rates increase demand directly by forcing manufacturers to include recycling in their operations. Content mandates specify that a certain percentage of a new product must consist of recycled material. Utilization rates are a more flexible option: industries are permitted to meet the recycling targets at any point of their operation or even contract recycling out in exchange for [trade]able credits. Opponents to both of these methods point to the large increase in reporting requirements they impose, and claim that they rob industry of necessary flexibility.

Governments have used their own purchasing power to increase recycling demand through what are called "procurement policies." These policies are either "set-asides," which earmark a certain amount of spending solely towards recycled products, or "price preference" programs which provide a larger budget when recycled items are purchased. Additional regulations can target specific cases: in the United States, for example, the Environmental Protection Agency mandates the purchase of oil, paper, tires and building insulation from recycled or re-refined sources whenever possible.[2]

The final government regulation towards increased demand is recycled product labeling. When producers are required to label their packaging with amount of recycled material in the product (including the packaging), consumers are better able to make educated choices. Consumers with sufficient buying power can then choose more environmentally conscious options, prompt producers to increase the amount of recycled material in their products, and indirectly increase demand. Standardized recycling labeling can also have a positive effect on supply of recyclates if the labeling includes information on how and where the product can be recycled.[2]

Recyclate is a raw material that is sent to, and processed in a waste recycling plant or materials recovery facility which will be used to form new products.[13] The material is collected in various methods and delivered to a facility where it undergoes re-manufacturing so that it can used in the production of new materials or products. For example, plastic bottles that are collected can be re-used and made into plastic pellets, a new product.[14]

Quality of recyclate
The quality of recyclates is recognized as one of the principal challenges that needs to be addressed for the success of a long term vision of a green economy and achieving zero waste. Recyclate quality is generally referring to how much of the raw material is made up of target material compared to the amount of non-target material and other non- recyclable material.[15] Only target material is likely to be recycled, so a higher amount of non-target and non-recyclable material will reduce the quantity of recycling product.[15] A high proportion of non-target and non-recyclable material can make it more difficult for re-processors to achieve ‘high-quality’ recycling. If the recyclate is of poor quality, it is more likely to end up being down-cycled or, in more extreme cases, sent to other recovery options or landfill.[15] For example, to facilitate the re-manufacturing of clear glass products there are tight restrictions for colored glass going into the re-melt process.

The quality of recyclate not only supports high quality recycling, it can deliver significant environmental benefits by reducing, reusing, and keeping products out of landfills.[15] High quality recycling can help support growth in the economy by maximizing the economic value of the waste material collected.[15] Higher income levels from the sale of quality recyclates can return value which can be significant to local governments, households and businesses.[15] Pursuing high quality recycling can also provide consumer and business confidence in the waste and resource management sector and may encourage investment in that sector.

There are many actions along the recycling supply chain that can influence and affect the material quality of recyclate.[16] It begins with the waste producers who place non-target and non-recyclable wastes in recycling collection. This can affect the quality of final recyclate streams or require further efforts to discard those materials at later stages in the recycling process.[16] The different collection systems can result in different levels of contamination. Depending on which materials are collected together, extra effort is required to sort this material back into separate streams and can significantly reduce the quality of the final product.[16] Transportation and the compaction of materials can make it more difficult to separate material back into separate waste streams. Sorting facilities are not one hundred per cent effective in separating materials, despite improvements in technology and quality recyclate which can see a loss in recyclate quality.[16] The storage of materials outside where the product can become wet can cause problems for re-processors. Reprocessing facilities may require further sorting steps to further reduce the amount of non-target and non-recyclable material.[16] Each action along the recycling path plays a part in the quality of recyclate.

Quality recyclate action plan (Scotland)
The Recyclate Quality Action Plan of Scotland sets out a number of proposed actions that the Scottish Government would like to take forward in order to drive up the quality of the materials being collected for recycling and sorted at materials recovery facilities before being exported or sold on to the reprocessing market.[16]

The plan’s objectives are to:

Drive up the quality of recyclate.
Deliver greater transparency around the quality of recyclate.
Provide help to those contracting with materials recycling facilities to identify what is required of them
Ensure compliance with the Waste (Scotland) regulations 2012.
Stimulate a household market for quality recyclate.
Address and reduce issues surrounding the Waste Shipment Regulations.
The plan focuses on three key areas, with fourteen actions which were identified to increase the quality of materials collected, sorted and presented to the processing market in Scotland.[17]

The three areas of focus are:

Collection systems and input contamination
Sorting facilities – material sampling and transparency
Material quality benchmarking and standards
Recycling consumer waste
A number of different systems have been implemented to collect recyclates from the general waste stream. These systems lie along the spectrum of trade-off between public convenience and government ease and expense. The three main categories of collection are "drop-off centres," "buy-back centres," and "curbside collection".

Drop-off centres
Drop-off centres require the waste producer to carry the recyclates to a central location, either an installed or mobile collection station or the reprocessing plant itself. They are the easiest type of collection to establish, but suffer from low and unpredictable throughput.

Buy-back centres
Buy-back centres differ in that the cleaned recyclates are purchased, thus providing a clear incentive for use and creating a stable supply. The post-processed material can then be sold on, hopefully creating a profit. Unfortunately, government subsidies are necessary to make buy-back centres a viable enterprise, as according to the United States’ National Waste & Recycling Association, it costs on average US$50 to process a ton of material, which can only be resold for US$30.[2]

Curbside collection
Main article: Curbside collection
Curbside collection encompasses many subtly different systems, which differ mostly on where in the process the recyclates are sorted and cleaned. The main categories are mixed waste collection, commingled recyclables and source separation.[2] A waste collection vehicle generally picks up the waste.
At one end of the spectrum is mixed waste collection, in which all recyclates are collected mixed in with the rest of the waste, and the desired material is then sorted out and cleaned at a central sorting facility. This results in a large amount of recyclable waste, paper especially, being too soiled to reprocess, but has advantages as well: the city need not pay for a separate collection of recyclates and no public education is needed. Any changes to which materials are recyclable is easy to accommodate as all sorting happens in a central location.[2]

In a commingled or single-stream system, all recyclables for collection are mixed but kept separate from other waste. This greatly reduces the need for post-collection cleaning but does require public education on what materials are recyclable.[2][4]

Source separation is the other extreme, where each material is cleaned and sorted prior to collection. This method requires the least post-collection sorting and produces the purest recyclates, but incurs additional operating costs for collection of each separate material. An extensive public education program is also required, which must be successful if recyclate contamination is to be avoided.[2]

Source separation used to be the preferred method due to the high sorting costs incurred by commingled (mixed waste) collection. Advances in sorting technology (see sorting below), however, have lowered this overhead substantially—many areas which had developed source separation programs have since switched to comingled collection.[4]

Distributed Recycling
For some waste materials such as plastic, recent technical devices called recyclebots[18] enable a form of distributed recycling. Preliminary life-cycle analysis(LCA) indicates that such distributed recycling of HDPE to make filament of 3-D printers in rural regions is energetically favorable to either using virgin resin or conventional recycling processes because of reductions in transportation energy[19]


Once commingled recyclates are collected and delivered to a central collection facility, the different types of materials must be sorted. This is done in a series of stages, many of which involve automated processes such that a truckload of material can be fully sorted in less than an hour.[4] Some plants can now sort the materials automatically, known as single-stream recycling. In plants a variety of materials are sorted such as paper, different types of plastics, glass, metals, food scraps, and most types of batteries.[20] A 30 percent increase in recycling rates has been seen in the areas where these plants exist.[21]

Initially, the commingled recyclates are removed from the collection vehicle and placed on a conveyor belt spread out in a single layer. Large pieces of corrugated fiberboard and plastic bags are removed by hand at this stage, as they can cause later machinery to jam.

Next, automated machinery separates the recyclates by weight, splitting lighter paper and plastic from heavier glass and metal. Cardboard is removed from the mixed paper, and the most common types of plastic, PET (#1) and HDPE (#2), are collected. This separation is usually done by hand, but has become automated in some sorting centers: a spectroscopic scanner is used to differentiate between different types of paper and plastic based on the absorbed wavelengths, and subsequently divert each material into the proper collection channel.[4]

Strong magnets are used to separate out ferrous metals, such as iron, steel, and tin-plated steel cans ("tin cans"). Nonferrous metals are ejected by magnetic eddy currents in which a rotating magnetic field induces an electric current around the aluminium cans, which in turn creates a magnetic eddy current inside the cans. This magnetic eddy current is repulsed by a large magnetic field, and the cans are ejected from the rest of the recyclate stream.[4]

Finally, glass must be sorted by hand on the basis of its color: brown, amber, green, or clear.[4]

This process of recycling as well as reusing the recycled material proves to be advantageous for many reasons as it reduces amount of waste sent to landfills, conserves natural resources, saves energy, reduces greenhouse gas emissions, and helps create new jobs. Recycled materials can also be converted into new products that can be consumed again such as paper, plastic, and glass.[22]

The City and County of San Francisco’s Department of the Environment offers one of the best recycling programs to support its city-wide goal of Zero Waste by 2020.[23] San Francisco’s refuse hauler, Recology, operates an effective recyclables sorting facility in San Francisco, which helped San Francisco reach a record-breaking diversion rate of 80%.[24]

Recycling industrial waste

Although many government programs are concentrated on recycling at home, a large portion of waste is generated by industry. The focus of many recycling programs done by industry is the cost-effectiveness of recycling. The ubiquitous nature of cardboard packaging makes cardboard a commonly recycled waste product by companies that deal heavily in packaged goods, like retail stores, warehouses, and distributors of goods. Other industries deal in niche or specialized products, depending on the nature of the waste materials that are present.

The glass, lumber, wood pulp, and paper manufacturers all deal directly in commonly recycled materials. However, old rubber tires may be collected and recycled by independent tire dealers for a profit.

Levels of metals recycling are generally low. In 2010, the International Resource Panel, hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) published reports on metal stocks that exist within society[25] and their recycling rates.[26] The Panel reported that the increase in the use of metals during the 20th and into the 21st century has led to a substantial shift in metal stocks from below ground to use in applications within society above ground. For example, the in-use stock of copper in the USA grew from 73 to 238 kg per capita between 1932 and 1999.

The report authors observed that, as metals are inherently recyclable, the metals stocks in society can serve as huge mines above ground (the term "urban mining" has been coined with this idea in mind[27]). However, they found that the recycling rates of many metals are very low. The report warned that the recycling rates of some rare metals used in applications such as mobile phones, battery packs for hybrid cars and fuel cells, are so low that unless future end-of-life recycling rates are dramatically stepped up these critical metals will become unavailable for use in modern technology.

The military recycles some metals. The U.S. Navy’s Ship Disposal Program uses ship breaking to reclaim the steel of old vessels. Ships may also be sunk to create an artificial reef. Uranium is a very dense metal that has qualities superior to lead and titanium for many military and industrial uses. The uranium left over from processing it into nuclear weapons and fuel for nuclear reactors is called depleted uranium, and it is used by all branches of the U.S. military use for armour-piercing shells and shielding.

The construction industry may recycle concrete and old road surface pavement, selling their waste materials for profit.

Some industries, like the renewable energy industry and solar photovoltaic technology in particular, are being proactive in setting up recycling policies even before there is considerable volume to their waste streams, anticipating future demand during their rapid growth.[28]

Recycling of plastics is more difficult, as most programs can’t reach the necessary level of quality. Recycling of PVC often results in downcycling of the material, which means only products of lower quality standard can be made with the recycled material. A new approach which allows an equal level of quality is the Vinyloop process. It was used after the London Olympics 2012 to fulfill the PVC Policy.[29]

e-Waste recycling
Main article: Computer recycling
E-waste is a growing problem, accounting for 20-50 million metric tons of global waste per year according to the EPA. Many recyclers do not recycle e-waste or do not do so responsibly. The e-Stewards certification was created to ensure recyclers are held to the highest standards for environmental responsibility and to give consumers an easy way to identify responsible recyclers. e-Cycle, LLC, was the first mobile recycling company to be e-Stewards certified.

Plastic recycling
Main article: Plastic recycling
Plastic recycling is the process of recovering scrap or waste plastic and reprocessing the material into useful products, sometimes completely different in form from their original state. For instance, this could mean melting down soft drink bottles and then casting them as plastic chairs and tables.[30]

Physical Recycling
Some plastics are remelted to form new plastic objects, for example PET water bottles can be converted into clothing grade polyester. A disadvantage of this type of recycling is that in each use and recycling cycle the molecular weight of the polymer can change further and the levels of unwanted substances in the plastic can increase.

Chemical Recycling
For some polymers it is possible to convert them back into monomers, for example PET can be treated with an alcohol and a catalyst to form a dialkyl terephthalate. The terephthalate diester can be used with ethylene glycol to form a new polyester polymer. Thus it is possible to make the pure polymer again.

Waste Plastic Pyrolysis to fuel oil
Another process involves the conversion of assorted polymers into petroleum by a much less precise thermal depolymerization process. Such a process would be able to accept almost any polymer or mix of polymers, including thermoset materials such as vulcanized rubber tires and the biopolymers in feathers and other agricultural waste. Like natural petroleum, the chemicals produced can be made into fuels as well as polymers. RESEM Technology[31] plant of this type exists in Carthage, Missouri, USA, using turkey waste as input material. Gasification is a similar process, but is not technically recycling since polymers are not likely to become the result. Plastic Pyrolysis can convert petroleum based waste streams such as plastics into quality fuels, carbons. Given below is the list of suitable plastic raw materials for pyrolysis:

Mixed plastic (HDPE, LDPE, PE, PP, Nylon, Teflon, PS, ABS, FRP etc.)
Mixed waste plastic from waste paper mill
Multi Layered Plastic
Recycling codes
Main article: Recycling codes
In order to meet recyclers’ needs while providing manufacturers a consistent, uniform system, a coding system is developed. The recycling code for plastics was introduced in 1988 by plastics industry through the Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc.[32] Because municipal recycling programs traditionally have targeted packaging—primarily bottles and containers—the resin coding system offered a means of identifying the resin content of bottles and containers commonly found in the residential waste stream.

Plastic products are printed with numbers 1–7 depending on the type of resin. Type 1 plastic, PET (or PETE): polyethylene terephthalate, is commonly found in soft drink and water bottles. Type 2, HDPE: high-density polyethylene is found in most hard plastics such as milk jugs, laundry detergent bottles, and some dishware. Type 3, PVC or V (vinyl), includes items like shampoo bottles, shower curtains, hoola hoops, credit cards, wire jacketing, medical equipment, siding, and piping. Type 4, called LDPE, or low-density polyethylene, is found in shopping bags, squeezable bottles, tote bags, clothing, furniture, and carpet. Type 5 is PP which stands for polypropylene and makes up syrup bottles, straws, Tupperware, and some automotive parts. Type 6 is PS: polystyrene and makes up meat trays, egg cartons, clamshell containers and compact disc cases. Type 7 includes all other plastics like bulletproof materials, 3- and 5-gallon water bottles, and sunglasses.[34] Types 1 and 2 are the most commonly recycled.

There is some debate over whether recycling is economically efficient. It is said[by whom?] that dumping 10,000 tons of waste in a landfill creates six jobs, while recycling 10,000 tons of waste can create over 36 jobs. However, the cost effectiveness of creating the additional jobs remains unproven. According to the U.S. Recycling Economic Informational Study, there are over 50,000 recycling establishments that have created over a million jobs in the US.[37] Two years after New York City declared that implementing recycling programs would be "a drain on the city," New York City leaders realized that an efficient recycling system could save the city over $20 million.[38] Municipalities often see fiscal benefits from implementing recycling programs, largely due to the reduced landfill costs.[39] A study conducted by the Technical University of Denmark according to the Economist found that in 83 percent of cases, recycling is the most efficient method to dispose of household waste.[4][9] However, a 2004 assessment by the Danish Environmental Assessment Institute concluded that incineration was the most effective method for disposing of drink containers, even aluminium ones.[40]

Fiscal efficiency is separate from economic efficiency. Economic analysis of recycling do not include what economists call externalities, which are unpriced costs and benefits that accrue to individuals outside of private transactions. Examples include: decreased air pollution and greenhouse gases from incineration, reduced hazardous waste leaching from landfills, reduced energy consumption, and reduced waste and resource consumption, which leads to a reduction in environmentally damaging mining and timber activity. About 4,000 minerals are known, of these only a few hundred minerals in the world are relatively common.[41] Known reserves of phosphorus will be exhausted within the next 100 years at current rates of usage.[42][43] Without mechanisms such as taxes or subsidies to internalize externalities, businesses will ignore them despite the costs imposed on society.[opinion] To make such nonfiscal benefits economically relevant, advocates have pushed for legislative action to increase the demand for recycled materials.[2] The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has concluded in favor of recycling, saying that recycling efforts reduced the country’s carbon emissions by a net 49 million metric tonnes in 2005.[4] In the United Kingdom, the Waste and Resources Action Programme stated that Great Britain’s recycling efforts reduce CO2 emissions by 10–15 million tonnes a year.[4] Recycling is more efficient in densely populated areas, as there are economies of scale involved.

Certain requirements must be met for recycling to be economically feasible and environmentally effective. These include an adequate source of recyclates, a system to extract those recyclates from the waste stream, a nearby factory capable of reprocessing the recyclates, and a potential demand for the recycled products. These last two requirements are often overlooked—without both an industrial market for production using the collected materials and a consumer market for the manufactured goods, recycling is incomplete and in fact only "collection".[2]

Many[who?] economists favor a moderate level of government intervention to provide recycling services. Economists of this mindset probably view product disposal as an externality of production and subsequently argue government is most capable of alleviating such a dilemma.

Trade in recyclates
Certain countries trade in unprocessed recyclates. Some have complained that the ultimate fate of recyclates sold to another country is unknown and they may end up in landfills instead of reprocessed. According to one report, in America, 50–80 percent of computers destined for recycling are actually not recycled.[44][45] There are reports of illegal-waste imports to China being dismantled and recycled solely for monetary gain, without consideration for workers’ health or environmental damage. Although the Chinese government has banned these practices, it has not been able to eradicate them.[46] In 2008, the prices of recyclable waste plummeted before rebounding in 2009. Cardboard averaged about £53/tonne from 2004–2008, dropped to £19/tonne, and then went up to £59/tonne in May 2009. PET plastic averaged about £156/tonne, dropped to £75/tonne and then moved up to £195/tonne in May 2009.[47] Certain regions have difficulty using or exporting as much of a material as they recycle. This problem is most prevalent with glass: both Britain and the U.S. import large quantities of wine bottled in green glass. Though much of this glass is sent to be recycled, outside the American Midwest there is not enough wine production to use all of the reprocessed material. The extra must be downcycled into building materials or re-inserted into the regular waste stream.[2][4]

Similarly, the northwestern United States has difficulty finding markets for recycled newspaper, given the large number of pulp mills in the region as well as the proximity to Asian markets. In other areas of the U.S., however, demand for used newsprint has seen wide fluctuation.[2]

In some U.S. states, a program called RecycleBank pays people to recycle, receiving money from local municipalities for the reduction in landfill space which must be purchased. It uses a single stream process in which all material is automatically sorted.

Much of the difficulty inherent in recycling comes from the fact that most products are not designed with recycling in mind. The concept of sustainable design aims to solve this problem, and was laid out in the book "Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things" by architect William McDonough and chemist Michael Braungart. They suggest that every product (and all packaging they require) should have a complete "closed-loop" cycle mapped out for each component—a way in which every component will either return to the natural ecosystem through biodegradation or be recycled indefinitely.[4] While recycling diverts waste from entering directly into landfill sites, current recycling misses the dissipative components. Complete recycling is impracticable as highly dispersed wastes become so diluted that the energy needed for their recovery becomes increasingly excessive. "For example, how will it ever be possible to recycle the numerous chlorinated organic hydrocarbons that have bioaccumulated in animal and human tissues across the globe, the copper dispersed in fungicides, the lead in widely applied paints, or the zinc oxides present in the finely dispersed rubber powder that is abraded from automobile tires?"[50]:260 As with environmental economics, care must be taken to ensure a complete view of the costs and benefits involved. For example, paperboard packaging for food products is more easily recycled than most plastic, but is heavier to ship and may result in more waste from spoilage.[51]

Energy and material flows
The amount of energy saved through recycling depends upon the material being recycled and the type of energy accounting that is used. Emergy (spelled with an m) analysis, for example, budgets for the amount of energy of one kind (exergy) that is required to make or transform things into another kind of product or service. Using emergy life-cycle analysis researchers have concluded that materials with large refining costs have the greatest potential for high recycle benefits. Moreover, the highest emergy efficiency accrues from systems geared toward material recycling, where materials are engineered to recycle back into their original form and purpose, followed by adaptive reuse systems where the materials are recycled into a different kind of product, and then by-product reuse systems where parts of the products are used to make an entirely different product.[52]

The Energy Information Administration (EIA) states on its website that "a paper mill uses 40 percent less energy to make paper from recycled paper than it does to make paper from fresh lumber."[53] Some critics argue that it takes more energy to produce recycled products than it does to dispose of them in traditional landfill methods, since the curbside collection of recyclables often requires a second waste truck. However, recycling proponents point out that a second timber or logging truck is eliminated when paper is collected for recycling, so the net energy consumption is the same. An Emergy life-cycle analysis on recycling revealed that fly ash, aluminum, recycled concrete aggregate, recycled plastic, and steel yield higher efficiency ratios, whereas the recycling of lumber generates the lowest recycle benefit ratio. Hence, the specific nature of the recycling process, the methods used to analyse the process, and the products involved affect the energy savings budgets.[52]

It is difficult to determine the amount of energy consumed or produced in waste disposal processes in broader ecological terms, where causal relations dissipate into complex networks of material and energy flow. For example, "cities do not follow all the strategies of ecosystem development. Biogeochemical paths become fairly straight relative to wild ecosystems, with very reduced recycling, resulting in large flows of waste and low total energy efficiencies. By contrast, in wild ecosystems, one population’s wastes are another population’s resources, and succession results in efficient exploitation of available resources. However, even modernized cities may still be in the earliest stages of a succession that may take centuries or millennia to complete."[54]:720 How much energy is used in recycling also depends on the type of material being recycled and the process used to do so. Aluminium is generally agreed to use far less energy when recycled rather than being produced from scratch. The EPA states that "recycling aluminum cans, for example, saves 95 percent of the energy required to make the same amount of aluminum from its virgin source, bauxite."[55][56] In 2009 more than half of all aluminium cans produced came from recycled aluminium.

Economist Steven Landsburg has suggested that the sole benefit of reducing landfill space is trumped by the energy needed and resulting pollution from the recycling process.[59] Others, however, have calculated through life cycle assessment that producing recycled paper uses less energy and water than harvesting, pulping, processing, and transporting virgin trees.[60] When less recycled paper is used, additional energy is needed to create and maintain farmed forests until these forests are as self-sustainable as virgin forests.

Other studies have shown that recycling in itself is inefficient to perform the “decoupling” of economic development from the depletion of non-renewable raw materials that is necessary for sustainable development.[61] The international transportation or recycle material flows through "…different trade networks of the three countries result in different flows, decay rates, and potential recycling returns."[62]:1 As global consumption of a natural resources grows, its depletion is inevitable. The best recycling can do is to delay, complete closure of material loops to achieve 100 percent recycling of nonrenewables is impossible as micro-trace materials dissipate into the environment causing severe damage to the planet’s ecosystems.[63][64][65] Historically, this was identified as the metabolic rift by Karl Marx, who identified the unequal exchange rate between energy and nutrients flowing from rural areas to feed urban cities that create effluent wastes degrading the planet’s ecological capital, such as loss in soil nutrient production.[66][67] Energy conservation also leads to what is known as Jevon’s paradox, where improvements in energy efficiency lowers the cost of production and leads to a rebound effect where rates of consumption and economic growth increases.

The amount of money actually saved through recycling depends on the efficiency of the recycling program used to do it. The Institute for Local Self-Reliance argues that the cost of recycling depends on various factors around a community that recycles, such as landfill fees and the amount of disposal that the community recycles. It states that communities start to save money when they treat recycling as a replacement for their traditional waste system rather than an add-on to it and by "redesigning their collection schedules and/or trucks."[69]

In some cases, the cost of recyclable materials also exceeds the cost of raw materials. Virgin plastic resin costs 40 percent less than recycled resin.[70] Additionally, a United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) study that tracked the price of clear glass from July 15 to August 2, 1991, found that the average cost per ton ranged from $40 to $60,[71] while a USGS report shows that the cost per ton of raw silica sand from years 1993 to 1997 fell between $17.33 and $18.10.[72]

In a 1996 article for The New York Times, John Tierney argued that it costs more money to recycle the trash of New York City than it does to dispose of it in a landfill. Tierney argued that the recycling process employs people to do the additional waste disposal, sorting, inspecting, and many fees are often charged because the processing costs used to make the end product are often more than the profit from its sale.[73] Tierney also referenced a study conducted by the Solid Waste Association of North America (SWANA) that found in the six communities involved in the study, "all but one of the curbside recycling programs, and all the composting operations and waste-to-energy incinerators, increased the cost of waste disposal."[74]

Tierney also points out that "the prices paid for scrap materials are a measure of their environmental value as recyclables. Scrap aluminum fetches a high price because recycling it consumes so much less energy than manufacturing new aluminum."

However, comparing the market cost of recyclable material with the cost of new raw materials ignores economic externalities—the costs that are currently not counted by the market. Creating a new piece of plastic, for instance, may cause more pollution and be less sustainable than recycling a similar piece of plastic, but these factors will not be counted in market cost. A life cycle assessment can be used to determine the levels of externalities and decide whether the recycling may be worthwhile despite unfavorable market costs. Alternatively, legal means (such as a carbon tax) can be used to bring externalities into the market, so that the market cost of the material becomes close to the true cost.

In a 2007 article, Michael Munger, chairman of political science at Duke University, wrote that "if recycling is more expensive than using new materials, it can’t possibly be efficient…. There is a simple test for determining whether something is a resource… or just garbage… If someone will pay you for the item, it’s a resource…. But if you have to pay someone to take the item away,… then the item is garbage."

In a 2002 article for The Heartland Institute, Jerry Taylor, director of natural resource studies at the Cato Institute, wrote, "If it costs X to deliver newly manufactured plastic to the market, for example, but it costs 10X to deliver reused plastic to the market, we can conclude the resources required to recycle plastic are 10 times more scarce than the resources required to make plastic from scratch. And because recycling is supposed to be about the conservation of resources, mandating recycling under those circumstances will do more harm than good."

The recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment in India and China generates a significant amount of pollution. Informal recycling in an underground economy of these countries has generated an environmental and health disaster. High levels of lead (Pb), polybrominated diphenylethers (PBDEs), polychlorinated dioxins and furans, as well as polybrominated dioxins and furans (PCDD/Fs and PBDD/Fs) concentrated in the air, bottom ash, dust, soil, water and sediments in areas surrounding recycling sites.[77] Critics also argue that while recycling may create jobs, they are often jobs with low wages and terrible working conditions.[78] These jobs are sometimes considered to be make-work jobs that don’t produce as much as the cost of wages to pay for those jobs. In areas without many environmental regulations and/or worker protections, jobs involved in recycling such as ship breaking can result in deplorable conditions for both workers and the surrounding communities
Economist Steven Landsburg, author of a paper entitled "Why I Am Not an Environmentalist,"[79] has claimed that paper recycling actually reduces tree populations. He argues that because paper companies have incentives to replenish their forests, large demands for paper lead to large forests, while reduced demand for paper leads to fewer "farmed" forests.[80]

When foresting companies cut down trees, more are planted in their place. Most paper comes from pulp forests grown specifically for paper production.[74][81][82][83] Many environmentalists point out, however, that "farmed" forests are inferior to virgin forests in several ways. Farmed forests are not able to fix the soil as quickly as virgin forests, causing widespread soil erosion and often requiring large amounts of fertilizer to maintain while containing little tree and wild-life biodiversity compared to virgin forests.[84] Also, the new trees planted are not as big as the trees that were cut down, and the argument that there will be "more trees" is not compelling to forestry advocates when they are counting saplings.

In particular, wood from tropical rainforests is rarely harvested for paper. Rainforest deforestation is mainly caused by population pressure demands for land.[85]

With many materials that can be recycled, such as fossil fuels and metals, there is only a finite amount of those resources, and people continue to use more of them all. Report asserts to reduce the current usage greatly and reuse them much more efficiently. For example, only 1% of rare earth metals are reused.[86] Those materials cannot easily be recovered when a product that contains them (such as a cell phone) is deposited in a landfill compared to if it was recycled.


Posted by !!! Painting with Light !!! #schauer on 2014-05-03 09:18:41

Tagged: , Schauer , Christian , Oberdiendorf , Hauzenberg , Passau , Bayern , Bavaria , Germany , Deutschland , Forest , Bier , Beer , Ale , bière , Urinieren , Pissen , Toilette , Klo , Wiederverwerten , Aport , Pisoir , Pipi , Pieseln , pee , Notdurft , Verwertung , Flasche , Bottle , bouteille , verre , Glas , glass , Strahl , Beam , faisceau , Stillleben , Still , Life , nature , morte , Schaum , foam , mousse , Blume , Flower , fleur , Liliput , Mini , Miniature , Miniatur , Klein , little , small



Posted by Daniel Kulinski on 2008-12-02 11:48:48

Tagged: , black , white , gray , close , close up , digit , number , home , end , delete , direction , button , press , keyboard , computer , it , choose , insert , cibe , key , dust , dirt , page , up , dof , focus , depth , communication , sepia , B&W , black and white , thing , samsung , pro815 , samsung pro815 , didmyself , did , myself , flickr , picture , photo , work , captured , mini , minimalism , cc-by-nc , depth of field , field , zoom , aperture , monochrome , kuliński

HTPC (AZZA/CypberpowerPC Case) Short Review

HTPC (AZZA/CypberpowerPC Case) Short Review

I originally obtained this case from Cyberpower PC which they call it the Zeus Mini. It is a great small form factor case, but I feel that it does not do to well in cooling the components.

It looks cool with it’s exterior lights on the front with the brushed metal face.

Working with this case was very difficult due to my fat pudgy hands and inexperience. I had to remove all the fans that are placed over the components before installing a long 292mm Gigabyte GTX 770 Video Card. The power source for the video card were touching the ceiling of the case causing slight bending. Wire management was very difficult and it was very messy looking to my taste. The top of the case has some air holes but is not dust proof. The front IO has only one usb 2.0 and one 3.0.

Posted by E_mil on 2014-10-05 10:07:49

Tagged: , Corsair , Intel , Azza , Z , 120mm , Fan , MSI , Mobo , Motherboard , Ram , HTPC , Lights , Red , LED , Cool , Cooling , Stock , Duo , Core , SFF , Small , Form , Factor , Mini , PC , Desktop , Computer , GSkill , Disc , PSU , CPU , Harddrive , Review , Short